طرح بهینه میراگر جرمی متوازن تحت اندرکنش خاک-سازه به کمک الگوریتم جستجوی تقابلی متناوب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، کرج، ایران

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی زلزله، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی و مهندسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، کرج، ایران

چکیده

در این پژوهش، طراحی بهینه میراگر جرمی متوازن تحت اندرکنش خاک- سازه مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. برای این منظور، تابع هدف بر پایه حداقل‌سازی نرم H_∞ تابع تبدیل جابجایی بام در حوزه فرکانس تعریف شده و پارامترهای میراگر با استفاده از جستجوی تقابلی متناوب بهینه‌سازی شده‌اند. این الگوریتم فراابتکاری به شیوه خاص خود از یادگیری تقابلی برای جستجوی موثر بهینه سراسری بهره می برد. پس از تعیین مقادیر بهینه، عملکرد لرزه‌ای سازه در حوزه فرکانس و تحت مجموعه‌ای از رکوردهای حوزه دور و نزدیک در حوزه زمان ارزیابی شده است. نتایج بیانگر کاهش قابل توجه پاسخ‌های لرزه‌ای سازه در حالت کنترل‌شده در مقایسه با سازه اولیه، متعاقب تنظیم بهینه میراگر در هر حالت است. همچنین مشاهده شد که سیستم کنترل در تحریک‌های حوزه دور عملکرد بهتری نسبت به حوزه نزدیک دارد. افزون بر این، مقایسه حالات پی صلب، خاک سخت و خاک نرم نشان می‌دهد که شرایط خاک اثر معناداری بر مقادیر بهینه و کارایی سیستم میراگر دارد. نتایج تحقیق حاضر بیانگر اهمیت توجه هم‌زمان به اندرکنش خاک- سازه و انتخاب بهینه پارامترهای میراگر در تحقق عملکرد مطلوب کنترل لرزه‌ای می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Opposition-Switching Search for Optimal Seismic Control by Tuned Mass Damper Considering Soil-Structure Interaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Shahrouzi 1
  • Seyed Hossein Hosseini Lavasani 1
  • Javad Gholizadeh 2
1 Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran
2 MSc Student, Faculty of Engineering, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran
چکیده [English]

In this study, the optimal design of a tuned mass damper (TMD) considering soil–structure interaction (SSI) is investigated. To this end, the objective function is formulated based on minimizing the H∞ norm of the roof-displacement transfer function in the frequency domain. The TMD parameters are optimized utilizing Opposition-Switching Search (OSS). It is a powerful metaheuristic algorithm that applies opposition-based learning in its particular steps to effectively seek the design space for global optimum. After obtaining the optimal parameters, seismic performance of the controlled structure is evaluated both in the frequency domain and under a set of far-field and near-field earthquake records in the time domain. Consequently, significant reduction in the seismic responses of structure was observed in each case due to the proposed control by the optimized TMD. Furthermore, the controlled system exhibits better performance under far-field ground motions. In addition, comparison between the rigid, stiff, and soft soil conditions shows that soil flexibility has a remarkable influence on both the optimal parameters and the performance of the TMD. These findings highlight the importance of simultaneous consideration of SSI effects and optimal TMD design in achieving efficient seismic control.  

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Passive Control
  • Tuned Mass Damper
  • Opposition-Switching Search
  • Soil-structure interaction

مراجع

[1] Farzam MF, Jalali HH, Gavgani SAM, Kayabekir AE, Bekdaş G. Current Trends in the Optimization Approaches for Optimal Structural Control. Studies in Systems Decision and Control. 2021; 326: 133-179. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61848-35
[2] Kamgar R, Khatibinia M, Khatibinia M. Optimization criteria for design of tuned mass dampers including soil-structure interaction effect. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering. 2019 Apr 10; 9(2): 213-232.
[3] Tehrani SM, Raissi Dehkordi M, Rajabi E. Seismic Vibration Control of the Special Truss Moment Frame (STMF) Using Buckling Restrained Braces and Tuned Mass Dampers. Civil Infrastructure Researches. 2025; 11(2): 17-30. doi: 10.22091/cer.2025.12392.1603 [In Persian]
[4] Kaveh A, Rezazadeh Ardebili S. A Comparative Study of the Optimum Tuned Mass Damper for High-rise Structures Considering Soil-structure Interaction. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering. 2021; 65: 1036-1049. doi: 10.3311/PPci.18386
[5] Fahimi Farzam M, Charkhtab Basim M, Maroofiazar R. Efficiency and Robustness of Optimally Designed Tuned Mass Dampers for Mid- and High-Rise Buildings Under Far and Near-Field Earthquakes. Journal of Vibration Engineering and Technologies. 2023; 11: 699-719. doi: 10.1007/s42417-022-00604-x
[6] Fahimi Farzam M, Hojat Jalali H. Tandem tuned mass damper inerter for passive control of buildings under seismic loads. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 2022; 29(9): e2987. doi: 10.1002/stc.2987
[7] Hosseini Lavasani SH, Doroudi R. Meta heuristic active and semi-active control systems of high-rise building. International Journal of Structural Engineering. 2020; 10: 232-253. doi: 10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2020.108529
[8] Etedali S, Rakhshani H. Optimum design of tuned mass dampers using multi-objective cuckoo search for buildings under seismic excitations. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2018; 57: 3205-3218. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2018.01.009
[9] Shahrouzi M, Salehi A. Enhanced imperialist competitive algorithm for optimal structural design. Scientia Iranica. Transaction A, Civil Engineering. 2021 Aug 1; 28(4): 1973-1993. doi: 10.24200/sci.2020.53827.3441
[10] Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Stephens B, Mirjalili S. Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm. Knowledge-based systems. 2020 Mar 5; 191: 105190. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105190
[11] Aghajani R, Azizpour Miandoab O, Kourehli SS, Khodabandehlou A. Identification of Damage and Model Updating Using Residual Force Modal Analysis and Optimization Algorithms. Civil Infrastructure Researches. 2025; 11(1): 87-104. doi: 10.22091/cer.2025.11502.1584 [In Persian]
[12] Shahrouzi M, Barzigar A, Rezazadeh D. Static and Dynamic Opposition-based Learning for Colliding Bodies Optimization. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering. 2019; 9: 499-523.
[13] Shahrouzi M. Switching teams algorithm for sizing optimization of truss structures. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering. 2020; 10(3): 365-389.
[14] Kaveh A, Hoseini Vaez SR, Hosseini P. Enhanced vibrating particles system algorithm for damage identification of truss structures. Scientia Iranica. 2019; 26(1): 246-256. doi: 10.24200/sci.2017.4265
[15] Kaveh A, Ilchi Ghazaan M. Vibrating particles system algorithm for truss optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints. Acta Mechanica. 2017; 228: 307-322. doi: 10.1007/s00707-016-1725-z
[16] Shahrouzi M, Kaveh A. An efficient derivative-free optimization algorithm inspired by avian life-saving manoeuvres. Journal of Computational Science. 2022; 57: 101483. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101483
[17] Shahrouzi M, Fahimi-Farzam M, Gholizadeh J. Optimization of multiple tuned mass damper inerter by escaping bird search for seismic control of buildings. International Journal of Dynamics and Control. 2025; 13: 362. doi: 10.1007/s40435-025-01875-4
[18] Taghavi AM, Shahrouzi M. Optimal design of spatial structures by a novel meta-heuristic algorithm: Sound energy optimizer. Structures. 2024; 70: 107570. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107570
[19] Bekdaş G, Kayabekir AE, Nigdeli SM, Toklu YC. Tranfer function amplitude minimization for structures with tuned mass dampers considering soil-structure interaction. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2019; 116: 552-562. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.035
[20] Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM. Estimating optimum parameters of tuned mass dampers using harmony search. Engineering Structures. 2011; 33: 2716-2723. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.05.024
[21] Roozbahan M, Turan G. Optimization of Tuned Mass Dampers by Considering Soil-Structure Interaction and Uncertainty in Soil Parameters. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering. 2025 Jun 1; 11(2): 04025010. doi: 10.1061/AJRUA6.RUENG-1504
[22] Shahrouzi M, Farzam MF, Gholizadeh J. Optimal design of double-TMDI for seismic control of buildings under soil-structure interaction. Internaional Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering. 2025; 15(2): 203-219. doi: 10.22068/ijoce.2025.15.2.631
[23] Marian L, Giaralis A. Optimal design of a novel tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) passive vibration control configuration for stochastically support-excited structural systems. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2014; 38: 156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2014.03.007
[24] Pandit A, Ghiasi R, Malekjafarian A. On the optimization of Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI) systems for buildings subjected to real ground motions using slime mould algorithm. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2024 Apr 1; 179: 108557. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108557
[25] Shahrouzi M. Optimal Spectral Matching of Strong Ground Motion by Opposition-Switching Search. EngOpt. 2018 Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Engineering Optimization, Lisbon, Purtugal: Springer International Publishing. 2019; 713-724. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-97773-7
[26] Rahnamayan S, Tizhoosh HR, Salama MMA. Quasi-oppositional differential evolution. 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. 2007 Sep 25; 2229-2236. doi: 10.1109/CEC.2007.4424748
[27] Shahrouzi M, Salehi A. Design of Large-Scale Structures by an enhanced Metaheuristic utilizing Opposition-based Learning. 2020 4th Conference on Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation (CSIEC), Mashhad: IEEE. 2020 Sep 2; 027-031. doi: 10.1109/CSIEC49655.2020.9237319
[28] Hosseini Lavassani SH, Shangapour S. Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Hybrid Control of a High-Rise Building Including Soil–Structure Interaction Under Near-Field and Far-Field Ground Motions. Structural Engineering International. 2022; 32: 316-327. doi: 10.1080/10168664.2020.1838249
 
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله
CAPTCHA Image

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار